It pays to be first
Author(s): SUSAN CRAGIN
For the Monitor / Date: December 6,
2009
Page: / Section: Home & Family
Dean LeBaron is probably New Hampshire's best-known
financial guru, our state's very own Warren Buffett. But whereas
the folksy Buffett evokes images of Little House on the Prairie,
LeBaron is the Captain Kirk of investors, boldly going where no
investor has gone before.
Founder of Batterymarch Financial Management in 1969, LeBaron,
76, lives in Newbury. He is one of the inventors of index funds, a
pioneer of quantitative investing and computerized trading, and
one of the first institutional investors in the then-emerging
markets and agriculture. Demonstrating his philosophy that, in the
investment field, you should be where everyone else is not, he was
an early, and sometimes first, institutional investor in the
emerging markets of Argentina, Brazil, Chile, China, India,
Indonesia and Russia, and was invited by the Gorbachev government
to help privatize the Soviet military industrial complex.
How important is it to be first?
I'd say it's better to be first than to be absolutely right,
and I was usually first. I invested in countries before they had
commercial airlines. I kept three airplanes going for 15 years.
The largest plane, a Gulfstream II with tip tanks, was a fully
equipped quantitative investment office. I had pajamas, everything
I needed, in the plane. There wasn't much investment information
available for those markets, and I made investment decisions on
the spot.
For a time I invested in three Papua New Guinea plantations,
and I'd visit each for a week or so, once a year. Well, New Guinea
Air had only one 707, and service twice a week. To invest in
Eastern Europe and Russia, I bought a second house near Zurich,
which has a great airport, and I'd fly my Gulfstream over there
all the time to see what to invest in. And when I got back, I'd
ski. Well, I did the same thing in New Hampshire.
And you invested in China, correct?
I created the first Western investment fund in China. At the
time, there were no Chinese investment funds in China, so mine was
the first.
By the way, my Chinese contacts visited New Hampshire, too.
They wanted to see real people. I told them to go to Bradford
Junction, the Blackwater Junction Restaurant, and any church
supper. And they did. They liked New Hampshire very much. One who
came was Lou Jiwei, at the time head of the Shanghai Municipal
Office for Economic Reform. Well, he is now chairman of the China
Investment Corp., China's sovereign wealth fund in charge of
China's U.S. dollar balances, which is to say our trade deficit.
Very important for us, now.
Geographically, the world is a smaller place than when you
started investing. How do you work now? Do you still travel?
I travel much less but still work every day of the year,
regardless of my location, and regardless of the time, thanks to
the internet. I've always liked being online. I started e-mailing
back in the early 1980s, when you had to use Fortran and Cobol to
do it. E-mail is great because you have time control. The sender
can send when inspiration strikes. And the receiver can read the
message when he wants, and mull it over before he sends an answer.
I've flown to Hong Kong for a bad lunch where neither of us can
think of the right thing to say. That's a time-waster. Now, I say,
do all your work electronically. No one knows where you are, and
no one needs to.
Do you have any investment advice for the average person?
Successful investors incorporate their own personalities into
how they invest and what they invest in. But you must have a
consistent package.
For instance, are you a buy-and-hold investor? A short-term
investor? A conservative investor? A speculator? And what
interests you? What do you know about? And of course, think for
yourself. That's the most important.
You are a fan of Peter Drucker, who said, "For new
technology to replace old, it has to have at least 10 times the
benefit." Where today will we see "10 times the
benefit"?
I'll give you two examples. The first is clearly medicine. The
delivery of medicine in the United States is backward and
inefficient. At least 30 percent of what we spend on medicine is
entirely wasted. The Dartmouth Initiative is studying this right
now.
Medicine is structured around doctors. Doctors have designated
themselves as the "consumers" of medicine, and the
industry tries to please them. Well, General Motors made the same
mistake. They thought their dealers were the consumers, rather
than the people who drove the cars. The dealers of course wanted
to sell high-margin vehicles. The drivers, the consumers, wanted
something simpler and lower-cost. So GM lost market share to
others.
What do consumers want in a health insurance provider?
Something simpler, more accessible, lower-cost. Something where
you can get a simple answer to a simple question, if that's what
you want. There is a website called Just Answer (justanswer.com)
where you have to pay for the information. If you like the answer,
you pay from $9-$12. I paid $9 for the last bit of medical
information I wanted.
Also, doctors should do much more with computers in their
offices, by standardizing and sharing records. We have
fear-of-privacy issues here that are largely unfounded. There's a
patient-information program called The Patient Online at Dartmouth
Hitchcock in Lebanon that is very good.
Publishing is another area where there is going to be a big
change. Electronic publishing is going to be standard and we are
going to consume books in a different way than we do now. Right
now, we want paper books and we buy them, one at a time. When we
have electronic books we will get what I call bundles . . .Ten at
a time on the same subject, and have the ability to
cross-reference and compare.
You can live and work anywhere in the world. Why New
Hampshire?
I like New Hampshire. New Hampshire is comfortable. Many of the
people who move to New Hampshire do so for lifestyle reasons. They
are well-rounded.
The current economic situation seems to be very precarious.
I have called you a guru. Can you predict our economic future?
The best prediction is no prediction. We will have to be
flexible and not be committed to fixed ideas about the future. I
would say, though, that we will have 10 to 15 years of trauma,
followed by a new economic system that we create. We are writing
new history here. But I can't make predictions - nobody should
make predictions.
We may have new institutions, public/private partnerships.
There may be subsidized employment in the United States. Our new
economy may not be the strongest in the world. And our government
may not function well, may not be the best in the world. In fact
we may have a revolution. We must be ready to jump in whatever
direction is needed.
=========
For more provocative thoughts from Dean LeBaron, you may visit him
online at deanlebaron.com. |